|
Download a ZIP version of the Agenda
VISION STATEMENT
We shall be valued as an essential level of government which coordinates and distributes regional services in an effective, equitable and responsible manner.
MISSION STATEMENT
Our mission is to provide a professional level of governance and advocacy both responsive and accountable to the needs of our regional community.
Primary Overall Goals
-
Reorganize governance (other models) reduce levels of government (Regional Growth Strategy, boundary expansion/extension)
-
Environmental Stewardship/Leadership (including cultural, consolidation of water, improvement districts)
-
Partnerships (RDKB/community, service delivery, communities and orgs beyond RDKB jurisdiction (IHA))
-
Efficiency in service delivery (maintain, or increase while not increasing requisition)
-
Open/adaptive/innovative (new ways to doing business/grow while being financially responsible, prepare for uncertain future)
-
Coordinated support
-
Improve communication/trust (expand RDKB presentations and town hall meetings)
-
Regionalized infrastructure/utilities (licensing, coordination)
-
Affordable recreation (lifestyle)
Download a ZIP version of the Agenda
1) Call to Order
2) Consideration of the Agenda (Additions/Deletions)
3) Minutes
4) Delegation(s)
5) Unfinished Business
6) Tabling Resolution(s)
7) Communications
8) Communications (Information Only) - Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the following items be received:
9) Reports
|
A
|
Finance, Executive, Personnel & Policy Committee - Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the following items be approved for payment:
i) Int. Sch. of Accounts – Nov. 15/11
Cheque Nos. 27343 – 27784 |
$2,643,517.59 |
| ii) Payroll Account |
$383,111.99 |
| |
$3,026,629.58 |
ii) Recommendation: That the draft minutes of the Finance, Executive, Personnel & Policy Committee meeting held October 19, 2011 be received.
|
|
Criminal Record Check Policy
Recommendation: That the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors adopt the Criminal Record Check Policy as follows:
POLICY
The Regional District of Kootenay Boundary (the “Regional District of Kootenay Boundary”) requires Criminal Record Checks for all prospective candidates applying for positions designated as Sensitive Positions by the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary.
PURPOSE
Criminal Record Checks on candidates applying for Sensitive Positions with the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary demonstrate due diligence in protecting the interests of the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary and its residents. Criminal history disclosed by a Criminal Record Check, or failure to provide a Criminal Record Check, may render a candidate ineligible for employment with the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary in a Sensitive Position.
1. DEFINITIONS
In this Policy:
(a) Criminal Record Check means a Certified Criminal Record Check obtained from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (“RCMP”) pursuant to the application procedures established by the RCMP, as may be amended from time to time;
(b) Pardon means an official document issued by the National Parole Board indicating a person with a criminal record is forgiven and that their record has been sealed, meaning that the person receiving the Pardon is not required to declare their previous criminal record;
(c) Sensitive Position means:
(i) a position with an ongoing or significant relationship with Vulnerable Persons, where the nature of the position places the worker in a position of trust or care, or where the worker may have unsupervised access to Vulnerable Persons in the ordinary course of carrying out the duties of the position;
(ii) a position with significant duties involving the handling, investing, and/or protection of materials assets belonging to the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary, including but not limited to money;
(iii) a position with significant duties related to regulatory, emergency response and/or inspectional work to safeguard public health and safety and/or ensure bylaw compliance, which may include responsibilities to interface with the public, enter onto private property and/or generate revenue collection for the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary; and
(vi) such other positions reasonably designated as a Sensitive Position based on additional written criteria which is deemed appropriate by the Manager responsible for Human Resources from time to time and appended to this policy as a schedule.
(d) Vulnerable Person means:
(i) a child, namely an individual under 19 years of age;
(ii) an individual 19 years or older who receives or may need community care services because of a disability, age or illness, or who is or may be unable to take care of themselves or protect themselves against significant harm or exploitation; a vulnerable adult is a person who, for whatever reason, is at greater than normal risk of abuse; examples of vulnerable adults may include older people, especially those who are unwell, frail, confused and unable either to stand up for themselves or keep track of their affairs and people who are open to abuse because of learning difficulties, physical disabilities or mental illness; and
Reports Con’t
(iii) such other persons reasonably designated as vulnerable based on additional written criteria which is deemed appropriate by the Manager responsible for Human Resources (as designated from time to time by the Chief Administrative Officer) and appended to this policy as a schedule.
2. POLICY GUIDELINES
2.1 The Criminal Records Review Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 86 (the “CRRA”) does not impose a general duty on municipalities, including regional districts, to ensure that every individual who is hired for employment involving work with children or work with vulnerable adults undergoes a criminal record check in accordance with the CRRA. Nevertheless, it is prudent for the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary to implement a Criminal Record Check Policy to protect the interests of the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary and its residents.
2.2 This policy applies to all prospective candidates, including internal candidates, for each permanent, temporary full-time or part-time position deemed to be a Sensitive Position by the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary, regardless of whether the position is a paid position or a volunteer, student, intern or otherwise unpaid position.
2.3 A Criminal Record Check is satisfactory, and permits a prospective candidate to be considered for a Sensitive Position if:
(i) the Criminal Record Check is negative (i.e. indicates no prior convictions and/or existing charges);
(ii) the Criminal Record Check consists only of one or more Pardons;
(iii) the Criminal Record Check is positive, but where the Manager responsible for Human Resources (in consultation with others pursuant to clause 4.4 below) determines that any existing convictions and/or charges are unrelated to the proper performance of the duties of the Sensitive Position.
2.4 A prospective candidate for a Sensitive Position who refuses or neglects to provide a Criminal Record Check as required under this policy is ineligible for the Sensitive Position.
2.5 The Regional District of Kootenay Boundary will not refuse a Sensitive Position to an individual because he or she has been charged with or convicted of an offence that is unrelated to the proper performance of the duties of the Sensitive Position.
3. PROCEDURES
Prospective candidates
3.1 Department Managers will determine whether a Criminal Record Check is required for each vacant position in their department against the definition of “Sensitive Position” set out above, including any additional written criteria appended to this policy as a schedule.
3.2 Department Managers will advise the Manager responsible for Human Resources of any vacant position which in their determination requires a Criminal Record Check.
3.3 The Manager responsible for Human Resources will confirm if the positions identified by Department Managers require a Criminal Record Check.
3.4 In the event a Department Manager and the Manager responsible for Human Resources disagree on whether a vacant position requires a Criminal Record Check, final determination will be made by the Chief Administrative Officer.
3.5 Human Resources will post Sensitive Positions as requiring a Criminal Record Check.
3.6 Candidates interviewed for Sensitive Positions will be advised in the interview that the successful candidate will receive a confirmation of employment only after presenting a satisfactory Criminal Record Check directly to Human Resources. Any costs incurred in obtaining the criminal record check shall be reimbursed by the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary.
3.7 If the successful candidate, on receiving the Criminal Record Check, chooses to withdraw their application, they may do so without prejudice.
3.8 A positive Criminal Record Check will be immediately referred to the Manager responsible for Human Resources for consideration (see clause 4.4 below).
3.9 Should a prospective candidate with a positive Criminal Record Check be the successful candidate for a vacant position, the Criminal Record Check will be sealed in the successful candidate’s personnel file.
Successful candidates.
3.10 A successful candidate for a paid or unpaid position which is deemed to be a Sensitive Position and requires a Criminal Record Check, during the entire term of work with the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary, shall immediately notify Human Resources when the employee is convicted of an offence under the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 (the “Criminal Code”). Human Resources and other appropriate Regional District of Kootenay Boundary staff will review the conviction to determine what action, if any, ought to be taken in light of the worker’s paid or unpaid position and the nature of the criminal conviction.
3.11 A successful candidate for a paid or unpaid position which is deemed to be a Sensitive Position and requires a Criminal Record Check, during the entire term of work with the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary, shall immediately notify Human Resources when charged with an offence under the Criminal Code, where the nature of the offence is such as to be potentially harmful or detrimental to the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary’s reputation or capacity to deliver services to the public, will render the employee unable to properly perform some or all of their duties, may have a harmful effect on other employees of the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary, or for any other reason consistent with the purpose of designating the paid or unpaid position as a Sensitive Position.
3.12 Without restricting the generality of the foregoing, a worker must report a criminal charge under clause
3.11 when charged with the following offences:
(i) any violent sexual offence under the Criminal Code;
(ii) any offence under the Criminal Code involving children under 19 years of age;
(iii) violent or predatory crimes involving a Vulnerable Person, including but not limited to threats, stalking, assault, and the use, possession or distribution of a weapon;
(iv) any offence involving the making, possession or distribution of child pornography;
(v) theft (over $100) or fraud; and
(vi) motor vehicle and/or driving offences.
3.13. All additional information pertaining to criminal convictions and/or charges shall be retained in the manner outlined in clause 3.9 above.
4. RESPONSIBILITIES
4.1 In the event that a Department Manager and the Manager responsible for Human Resources disagree on a Sensitive Position designation, it is the responsibility of the Chief Administrative Officer to determine whether or not a position should be designated as a Sensitive Position, using the criteria set out in this policy, including any additional written criteria appended to this policy as a schedule.
4.2 It is the responsibility of the Human Resources Department to maintain a list of Sensitive Positions, insert notification on postings, and advise candidates in the interview process if a Criminal Records Check is required.
4.3 It is the responsibility of the Manager responsible for Human Resources to ensure Criminal Record Checks are produced and are satisfactory prior to filling a vacant position and before the start date.
4.4 It is the responsibility of the Manager responsible for Human Resources to determine the impact of a positive Criminal Record Check on an individual’s candidacy for a Sensitive Position in accordance with this policy. In fulfilling this responsibility, the Manager responsible for Human Resources may consult Departments Managers, the Chief Administrative Officer, and other appropriate Regional District of Kootenay Boundary staff on a need-to-know basis and otherwise as reasonably necessary.
4.5 It is the responsibility of prospective candidates in Sensitive Positions to comply with their obligations under this policy, including but not limited to obtaining, at their own cost, a Criminal Record Check to support their prospective candidacy for a Sensitive Position.
Recommendation: That the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors approves undertaking an independent review for the Chair’s Remuneration.
|
| B |
Electoral Area Services Committee - Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the minutes of the Electoral Area Services Committee meeting held October 27, 2011 be received.
|
| C |
East End Stakeholders Committee - Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the draft minutes of the East End Stakeholders Committee meeting held November 15, 2011 be received.
Recommendation: That the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors approves the 2012 – 2014 Fire Hydrant Agreements with the Villages of Montrose and Fruitvale, Cities of Rossland and Trail, the Genelle Improvement District and the Beaver Falls Waterworks District AND FURTHER that the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary’s signatories be authorized to enter into the agreements and forward them to the respective participants for endorsement.
|
| D |
Boundary Economic Development Committee - Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the draft minutes of the Boundary Economic Development Committee meeting held November 1, 2011 be received.
|
|
E
|
Staff Report(s)
i) A Memorandum of Board Resolutions and their status - Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the Memorandum be received.
ii) A report from Sig Dreher, Chief Building Official, regarding a building bylaw contravention in Electoral Area ‘E’ (C. & E. Maarhuis) - Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the staff report be received AND FURTHER that the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors invite the owners, Chad and Erika Maarhuis to appear before the Board to make a presentation relevant to the filing of a Notice in the Land Title Office pursuant to Section 695 of the Local Government Act and Section 57 of the Community Charter against the property legally described as Lot A, DL 291S, SDYD, Plan 27866.
iii) A report from Jeff Ginalias, Assistant Planner, regarding an application for subdivision in the ALR (Area ‘E’). - Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the staff report be received AND FURTHER that the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors forward the application for subdivision in the ALR submitted by Ruth and Gary Champagne for the properties legally described as DL 1208S, SDYD, except Plan attached to DD21998 That part of DL 2351 shown on Plan B2062, SDYD to the Agricultural Land Commission without a recommendation.
iv) A report from Jeff Ginalias, Assistant Planner, regarding a permit application referral from the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations for a permit to conduct mineral exploration on Crown Land in Area ‘E’ (vicinity of Buckhorn Creek, west of Greenwood) - Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the staff report be received AND FURTHER that the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors advise the Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, on behalf of the Mines Branch, that the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary supports the application submitted by Apex Geoscience for Golden Dawn Tam O’Shanter for a permit to conduct mineral exploration on Crown Land in the vicinity of Buckhorn Creek, west of Greenwood, and that the A.P.C. comments for a provision to ensure that no contaminated water enter any water course be provided for consideration.
v) A report from Jeff Ginalias, Assistant Planner, regarding a permit application referral from the Ministry of Energy and Mines and Responsible for Housing to conduct mineral exploration on Crown Land, subject to a mineral lease in Area ‘D’ (south of Phoenix turn-off) - Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the staff report be received AND FURTHER that the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors advise the Ministry of Energy and Mines and Responsible for Housing that the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary has no objection to the application submitted by Roxul Inc. for a permit to conduct mineral exploration on Crown Land off Lonestar Road near the Winner Quarry, west of Grand Forks, but wish to express concern about the recurring history of untimely receipt of referrals.
vi) A report from John MacLean, C.A.O., regarding a Memorandum of Understanding with B.C. Transit to expand hours in the Greater Trail Service Area - Corporate Vote – Weighted
Recommendation: That the staff report be received AND FURTHER that the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors authorizes staff to enter into the Memorandum of Understanding with B.C. Transit for expanded hours within the Greater Trail area.
vii) A report from Bryan Teasdale, Operations Manager, regarding the Liquid Waste Management Planning Stage II Steering Local Advisory and Technical Advisory Committee appointments -
Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the staff report be received AND FURTHER that the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors approve the following committee structures:
a) Steering Committee – That the current Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Director (and their designated Alternate Director) for each participating jurisdiction be appointed to the LWMP Stage II Steering Committee, along with a representative from the Ministry of Environment (i.e.: Regional Environmental Protection Manager) and appropriate Regional District of Kootenay Boundary staff members.
b) Local Advisory Committee – That the representative put forward from each participating jurisdiction (as described below) be appointed to the LWMP Stage II Local Advisory Committee:
City of Rossland – Bill Profili
Village of Warfield – Roland Perri
City of Trail – Scott Wallace
Village of Montrose – Ian McAlpine
Village of Fruitvale – Lloyd Girardo
Area ‘A’ – Jim Brown
Area ‘B’ – George Isherwood
c) Technical Advisory Committee – That representatives of provincial and federal government regulatory agencies as well as appropriate technical staff from the Regional District and all participating municipalities be appointed to the LWMP Stage II Technical Advisory Committee as required.
viii) A report from Bryan Teasdale, Operations Manager, regarding past Tender submissions for the construction of Mill Road sewer servicing capital infrastructure - Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the staff report be received AND FURTHERR that the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors reject all submissions for the Mill Road Sewer Servicing Project.
ix) A report from John MacLean, C.A.O., regarding the 9-1-1 Fire Dispatch Agreement with RDCK - Corporate Vote – Weighted
Recommendation: That the staff report be received AND FURTHER that the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors authorize the entering into the Letter of Understanding with the RDCK related to cost forecasts for the 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone Agreement.
x) A report from Gerry Gardner, Director of Finance, regarding the compiled Five Year Financial Plan for 2012 – 2016 - Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the staff report be received AND FURTHER that the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors refer the 2012 – 2016 Five Year Financial Plans to committees for consideration and deliberation in accordance with the Financial Plan Preparation, Consultation and Presentation Policy.
xi) A report from John MacLean, C.A.O., regarding Community Recreation Program grant applications (Areas ‘B’ & ‘C’) - Corporate Vote – Unweighted
Recommendation: That the staff report be received AND FURTHER that the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors endorse the submittal of applications from Area ‘B’ (Black Jack) and Area ‘C’ (walking bridge).
|
10) Bylaws
11) New Business
|
A
|
Grants-in-Aid
Electoral Area Directors Only
- Beaverdell Community Club – Area ‘E’ - $750
- Christina Lake Stewardship Society – Area ‘C’ - $1,400
- Canadian Red Cross – Area ‘D’ - $3,752
- Other
|
|
B
|
Other Business
|
12) Late Items
13) In Camera Meeting
Proceed to an in camera meeting pursuant to Section 90(k) of the Community Charter.
14) Adjournment
|